Stroud District Council (19 017 461)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council failed to properly consider the impact on bats, climate change or carbon emissions when resolving to grant planning permission for a residential development. This is because the complainant has not yet suffered a significant personal injustice as a result of the alleged fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Ms B, says the Council has failed to properly consider the impact on bats, climate change or carbon emissions when determining a planning application for a residential development.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered:
    • Ms B’s complaint to the Ombudsman;
    • The Council’s final response to the complaint;
    • Information about the planning application on the Council’s website;
    • Ms B’s comments on a draft version of this statement.

Back to top

What I found

  1. As I understand it, the Planning Committee resolved to grant planning permission for the development, subject to the completion of a legal agreement. This legal agreement has not yet been finalised, so the planning permission has not been issued.
  2. I therefore do not consider the Ombudsman should investigate Ms B’s complaint at the present time, because she has not yet suffered a significant personal injustice as a result of the alleged fault by the Council.
  3. It would be open to Ms B to return to the Ombudsman if the planning permission is issued in the future.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms B’s complaint. This is because she has not yet suffered a significant personal injustice as a result of the alleged fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings