Havant Borough Council (19 015 959)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Feb 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains the Council failed to follow planning procedure when is decided to grant planning permission for a development close to a Special Protection Area. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint as Mr X has not suffered significant personal injustice because of the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about fault in the planning process followed by the Council for an application for a development of more than 300 new homes.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A (6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by Mr X and the Council. This includes copies of his complaints to the Council and its response and information about the planning application.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to carry out an accurate Habitats Regulations Assessment for a planning application. He also says the planning officer gave the planning committee incorrect information.
  2. Mr X is a volunteer to a wildlife trust and is offended by the Council’s actions.
  3. The Ombudsman will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures by the service provider.
  4. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the complainant is using their enquiry as a way of raising a wider political or community campaign. In these cases, their concerns may be better addressed to their local councillor rather than the Ombudsman.
  5. Mr X says he is offended when the Council makes misleading statements to get planning applications approved. He also says the Council must respect the status given to Special Protection Areas. While I do not disagree with this, I do not consider that Mr X has suffered any personal injustice as a direct result of the Council’s action or lack of action.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate this complaint. The complainant has not suffered any personal injustice as a direct result of the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings