Amber Valley Borough Council (22 003 727)

Category : Planning > Planning advice

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jun 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the way the Council considered her planning application. Mrs X used her right of appeal to the planning inspector so the complaint is outside our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council refused to provide pre planning application advice when she was looking to build an accessible home for her and her children.
  2. She also complains the Council:
    • failed to engage with her
    • failed to provide any advice; and
    • failed to determine her planning application in time despite extending the deadline.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  2. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
    • delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
    • a decision to refuse planning permission
    • conditions placed on planning permission
    • a planning enforcement notice.
  3. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in the decision making, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs. X, including the Council’s response to her complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X sought pre planning application advice from the Council. The Council confirmed it does not provide this service.
  2. There is no duty on Local Planning Authorities to provide any pre application advice, therefore we cannot find fault in the Council not doing so.
  3. Mrs X put in a full planning application.
  4. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the way the Council considered her planning application. She has used her right of appeal to the planning inspector (see paragraph 3 and 4). This part of the complaint is therefore outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction we have no discretion to investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about a failure to provide pre planning application advice. There is no evidence of fault as there is no duty to provide such advice.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the way the Council considered the planning application as Mrs X has used her right of appeal. This part of the complaint is therefore outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings