Maidstone Borough Council (25 004 761)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the decision to grant planning permission for a new development near the complainant’s home. This decision was made by the Planning Inspectorate, which is not a body within our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about a decision to grant planning permission for over 100 new houses in the village where he lives.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. We cannot investigate the actions of bodies, such as the Planning Inspectorate. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 25 and 34A, as amended)
  2. The Planning Inspectorate acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspectorate considers appeals about:
  • delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • a decision to refuse planning permission
  • conditions placed on planning permission
  • a planning enforcement notice

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. An outline planning application for more than 100 new homes was made to the Council in August 2019. The Council refused the planning application in April 2024. The applicant appealed and the Planning Inspector allowed the appeal, granting planning permission in March 2025.
  1. I understand Mr X is dissatisfied with the information and responses the Council made to the Planning Inspector. However, the decision to allow the development was made by the Planning Inspectorate, which is not a body within the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction therefore we cannot investigate the matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Council did not grant the planning permission at the heart of Mr X’s complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings