Wakefield City Council (24 010 874)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to issue a Community Infrastructure Levy Demand Notice. The complainant has appealed to the Planning Inspector against the Demand Notice which takes the matter outside our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council is demanding a retrospective Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) payment based on a technicality.
  2. He appealed against the Council’s first CIL Demand Notice to the Planning Inspectorate, which dismissed the appeal. The Council has since withdrawn the original demand and issued a new one. Mr X has appealed against the latest notice.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • A decision to refuse planning permission
  • Conditions placed on planning permission
  • A planning enforcement notice
  • A decision to serve a CIL Demand Notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot investigate the CIL liability issue. This is because Mr X has used his right of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate to dispute the Council’s CIL Demand Notice and his liability to pay it. We cannot investigate a complaint where someone has appealed the matter complained of to the Inspectorate as the appeal takes it outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because his appeal to the Planning Inspectorate takes the matter outside our jurisdiction

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings