Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (22 013 818)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Jan 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because it is unlikely we could achieve the outcome the complainant wants.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mr X, has complained about the Council’s decision to grant his neighbour planning permission. Mr X says the development encroaches on his property and has damaged his driveway and garden. Mr X believes the Council has been negligent and should pay for the damage.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X believes the Council did not properly scrutinise his neighbour’s plans before granting planning permission for the extension and says it is responsible for the damage to his home. However, it is not for the Council to get involved with issues relating to property damage or boundary disputes and these were not material planning considerations. These will instead be private civil matters between Mr X and his neighbour.
  2. Mr X says the Council has been negligent. But the Ombudsman cannot decide if a council is negligent and does not have the power to award damages. Only the courts can do this. Therefore, it would be reasonable for Mr X to seek a remedy through the courts in relation to this part of his complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we cannot achieve the outcome he wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings