London Borough of Haringey (21 012 600)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of planning and building control matters relating to a property development close to Ms X’s home. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Ms X, complains about the Council’s handling of planning and building control matters relating to a property development close to her home which she believes has caused damage to her property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council granted planning permission for a housing development close to Ms X’s home. Following reports of a breach of condition attached to the permission, the Council investigated and met with the developer and builder on site. The relevant condition was subsequently discharged and the Council satisfied itself there was no existing breach of planning control.
  2. In response to Ms X’s concerns that development at the site had caused dangerous cracks to her own property, the Council’s Building Control visited Ms X but the officer did not consider the cracks to be dangerous.
  3. The Council has advised Ms X to appoint her own professional advisors and to contact her insurance company because any damage caused to her property as a result of the development is a civil matter between her and the developer.
  4. While I understand Ms X’s distress at the cracking at her property, the Council has correctly advised Ms X of the steps she should take and it is not a matter with which the Council is involved.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings