London Borough of Hillingdon (20 008 758)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Jan 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to take formal planning enforcement action against his neighbour. This is because it is unlikely we would find fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council has failed to take action against his neighbour for breaching planning control. He says his neighbour’s development is unsightly and out of keeping with the character and appearance of the area.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I reviewed Mr X’s complaint and the Council’s response. I shared my draft decision with Mr X and considered his comments.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X’s neighbour, Mr Y, applied to the Council for planning permission to extend his property in 2019. The Council granted planning permission but Mr X says the plans did not show one aspect of the development which he finds unsightly and considers is out of keeping with the character and appearance of the area. He reported this to the Council but says the Council allowed work to continue.
  2. The Council confirms it is aware of the issue Mr X has raised and carried out an inspection to assess its impact. It explained to Mr X that a planning enforcement officer took photos of the extension and discussed these with another officer but decided it would not be expedient to take formal enforcement action. This was because the alleged breach did not cause clear and demonstrable planning harm.
  3. Mr X disagrees with the Council’s decision but I have seen no evidence of fault in the way it was reached; we cannot therefore question it. The Council has considered the impact of the alleged breach and its decision not to take formal action is one it is entitled to make.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it is unlikely we would find fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings