Enforcement


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Bedford Borough Council (16 003 406)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 20-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Council delayed in taking enforcement action in respect of an unauthorised development on the Village Green next to Mr B's property. However Mr B did not suffer a significant injustice as a result.

  • Wycombe District Council (17 005 780)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 13-Nov-2017

    Summary: Mr X complained about the way the Council dealt with his neighbour's planning application. There was some fault but it did not cause a significant injustice.

  • Poole Borough Council (17 006 001)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 10-Nov-2017

    Summary: Ms B has complained that the Council has failed to take appropriate action in response to her complaints that a company is operating at a nearby inert waste recycling plant without planning permission or an Environment Agency license. The Ombudsman has closed the complaint because he has found no fault in the way the Council considered the alleged breaches of planning control, and the Environment Agency's actions are outside his jurisdiction.

  • Thanet District Council (17 005 770)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 09-Nov-2017

    Summary: Mr X says the Council failed to act against a breach of planning control by the operator of a business close to his home. There is fault by the Council because it made a commitment in August 2016 to investigate Mr X's concerns and it failed to do so. The Council agreed to remedy the injustice to Mr X by investigating the alleged breach of planning control.

  • Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (17 002 880)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 09-Nov-2017

    Summary: The complaint is the Council has not taken enforcement action against a breach of a condition on a planning permission. My decision is there is no evidence of fault.

  • North Hertfordshire District Council (17 005 428)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 08-Nov-2017

    Summary: A condition added to a planning permission was not necessary or relevant but this fault has not caused a significant enough injustice to warrant further investigation.

  • Wiltshire Council (17 001 047)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 07-Nov-2017

    Summary: Ms A complains the Council has failed to enforce the landscaping conditions attached to a planning application for the housing development site on which her property is located. There is no evidence of fault by the Council and we will not pursue the complaint any further.

  • West Berkshire Council (17 003 647)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 07-Nov-2017

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's failure to take planning enforcement action against a business that operates near his home. There was fault in the way the Council kept records of its actions, but this did not cause a significant injustice to Mr X.

  • North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (17 002 748)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 03-Nov-2017

    Summary: Mr A complains about the Council's handling of planning condition breaches by a supermarket located close to his home. There is no evidence of fault by the Council and we will not pursue the complaint any further.

  • Wealden District Council (17 010 656)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 02-Nov-2017

    Summary: Ms X complains about the Council's refusal to take planning enforcement action against a neighbour. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because the matter is out of time.

;