Reigate & Banstead Borough Council (25 017 087)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to issue an Enforcement Notice. Ms X has already appealed to the Planning Inspector and the law says we cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. Ms X also complains the Council failed to correctly respond to a subject access request. We consider it reasonable for Ms X to complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office which deals with such matters.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about the Council’s issuing of an Enforcement Notice. She also complains the Council failed to correctly respond to a subject assess request.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says the Council did not act proportionately when it issued an Enforcement Notice.
  2. However, Ms X has already appealed to the Planning Inspector against the notice. We cannot investigate when someone has appealed to the Planning Inspector, even if the appeal did not address all the issues complained about.
  3. Ms X also complains the Council failed to correctly respond to a subject access request. If Ms X believes the Council is withholding information she is entitled to see, it is reasonable to expect her to complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). This is the body set up by government to deal with information rights.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because:
    • She has already appealed against the enforcement notice; and
    • It is reasonable to expect her to complain to the ICO about Council’s failure to correctly respond to her subject access request.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings