Bedford Borough Council (25 014 664)
Category : Planning > Enforcement
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 17 Dec 2025
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a breach of planning control. This is because the complainant had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.
The complaint
- Mr X has complained about how the Council dealt with a breach of planning control. Mr X says the Council has treated him unfairly and says he has incurred additional costs because of the Council’s actions.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
- The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
- Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
- A decision to refuse planning permission
- Conditions placed on planning permission
- A planning enforcement notice.
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Mr X has complained about how the Council dealt with a planning breach at his property. Mr X says he has been treated unfairly as he believes the breach was reported by someone who has a connection to the Council. He also says similar developments have been carried out at other properties in the area. But the Council has a duty to investigate possible planning breaches when they are reported.
- If Mr X did not agree the development needed planning permission, he could have chosen not to take any action and appealed to the Planning Inspector if the Council issued an enforcement notice. I consider it would have been reasonable for Mr X to have used his right to appeal, and the Ombudsman will not usually investigate when someone has the right to appeal.
- Mr X also could have submitted a retrospective planning application to regularise the development or applied for a lawful development certificate to confirm if planning permission was needed. Mr X would have had the right to appeal if the applications were refused.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman