Manchester City Council (25 001 381)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint about a planning enforcement notice. This is because Mr B appealed to the Planning Inspector. The courts are in the best position to decide whether Mr B has complied with the requirements of the notice.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains the Council wrongly issued him with a planning enforcement notice which required him to remove a structure he had added to his property. Mr B also says the Council has recently asked him to remove further items which he says are not part of the structure which the enforcement notice required him to remove.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B put in an appeal to the Planning Inspector against the enforcement notice issued by the Council. This means we cannot investigate his complaint about the Council’s decision to issue this enforcement notice.
  2. There is a disagreement between Mr B and the Council about whether he has fully complied with the requirements of this enforcement notice. This is not a matter we will investigate. If the Council pursues this matter further it will take Mr B to court. The courts are in the best position to decide whether a person has complied with the requirements of a planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint about this enforcement notice because he appealed to the Planning Inspector. The courts are in the best position to decide if Mr B has complied with the requirements of the notice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings