Vale Of White Horse District Council (24 019 257)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to enforce planning permission. That is because it is a late complaint and there is no good reason to exercise discretion and consider it now.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s decision not to take planning enforcement action after a developer did not install a boundary treatment. He said there was meant to be an evergreen hedge between his property and the new development, but it had not been planted. Mr X believes there is bias in the Council’s planning department in favour of developers. He wants the Council to take enforcement action and improve transparency in its decision making.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council did not enforce planning permissions at the development. The Council wrote to Mr X in 2021 stating it did not intend to take enforcement action. Mr X did not complain to the Ombudsman until 2025. Therefore, this complaint is late and there is no good reason to exercise discretion and consider it now. It was reasonable for Mr X to complain to us sooner if he was unhappy with the Council’s decision making.
  2. We will also not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council’s planning department demonstrates bias in its decision making. That is because we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm or distress as a direct result of faults or failures by an organisation. Mr X has not suffered a direct, personal injustice by the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is late.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings