Northumberland County Council (23 019 050)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Apr 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to provide information in 2013. The complaint is late, and we have seen no good reason to exercise our discretion to investigate.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains for her client Mr Y. She says the Council failed to disclose information to Mr Y when he bought a property in 2013. She says it provided the information in 2019.
  2. Ms X says the Council is responsible for Mr Y’s financial losses. He is seeking compensation of £120,000.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says Mr Y sought information from the Council in 2013 before buying a property. She says he did not receive a response despite making many requests.
  2. However, Ms X has not provided any evidence of Mr Y’s requests (which were made to a former authority that no longer exists) and the Council says it has no record of them.
  3. In 2019, the Council provided information to Mr Y in response to a subject access request made under the UK General Data Protection Regulations. It says the information was held in files of a former district council which was abolished in 2009 and its function passed to the Council.
  4. Ms X also refers to applications for Certificates of lawfulness of existing use or development which were approved by the Council. She says errors by the Council enabled a parish council to seek judicial review of the approvals, causing Mr Y to incur significant financial losses.
  5. The matters and events Ms X refers to occurred more than 12 months ago. Mr X became aware of the relevant information in 2019. The complaint is therefore late. I have seen no reason why he could not have complained to the Ombudsman at that time.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because the complaint is late, and the restriction detailed on paragraph four applies. We have seen no reason why Mr Y could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings