North Norfolk District Council (23 016 729)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Jun 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alleged breach of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. The complaint is late and there is no reason to investigate after more than three years. Also, the complainant has the right to appeal to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains for Mr Y. He says the Council breached the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). He says officers visited a private address and took photographs as part of a planning enforcement investigation. He also says officers did not have power of entry to the premises.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference, or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In response to my enquiries Mr X confirmed the incident he complains about occurred some years ago, possibly during a period of lockdown during the Covid 19 pandemic.
  2. The law says a complaint must be made to the Ombudsman within twelve months of the complainant becoming aware of the matter. Mr X confirms the visit to Mr Y’s premises and alleged breach of RIPA occurred more than 3 years ago. The complaint is therefore late, and we have seen no reason why he could not have complained to us much sooner.
  3. In addition to the complaint being late, Mr Y can appeal to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal if he believes RIPA has been breached as this is the appropriate body to consider complaints about RIPA. The Ombudsman will not usually investigate matters where the complainant has the right to appeal to a tribunal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because:
    • it is late and we have seen no reason to investigate now; and
    • he can complain to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal if he believes RIPA has been breached

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings