Medway Council (23 008 541)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council deciding not to take planning enforcement action over a flag being flown without permission. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has failed to take enforcement action to stop a flag being flown without permission.
  2. Mr X says this has affected his mental health; he wants the Council to take enforcement action and apologise to him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in the decision making, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Councils can take enforcement action if they find planning rules have been breached. However, Government guidance states that councils should not take enforcement action just because there has been a breach of planning control. Planning enforcement is discretionary and formal action should happen only when it would be a proportionate response to the breach and expedient to do so.
  2. The Council confirms it has considered the reported breach but that it does not consider the flag is causing harm and so it will not take enforcement action; this was a decision it was entitled to make.
  3. I appreciate Mr X is unhappy with the flag which is being flown and with the Council’s decision not to take enforcement action.
  4. However, the Ombudsman does not act as an appeal body for enforcement decisions. Our role is to consider if there was any fault in the way the decision was made.
  5. I have not seen sufficient evidence of fault in the way the Council considered the reported breaches to justify investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault in the way the Council considered his report of a breach.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings