London Borough of Redbridge (22 004 758)
Category : Planning > Enforcement
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 18 Jul 2022
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: Ms X complains that the Council has provided misleading information to the Planning Inspector. We will not investigate this complaint because she appealed to a Planning Inspector.
The complaint
- Ms X complains that the Council has provided misleading information to the Planning Inspector.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
- delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
- a decision to refuse planning permission
- conditions placed on planning permission
- a planning enforcement notice.
- We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
- I considered the complainant’s comments on my draft decision.
My assessment
- Ms X appealed to the Planning Inspector against a refusal to grant planning permission for her property. She says that the Council has provided misleading evidence to the Planning Inspector about a noise nuisance.
- The Ombudsman cannot investigate a complaint which has been appealed to a Planning Inspector. Further, she has the opportunity to present any alternative evidence to the Planning Inspector to ensure that she receives a fair hearing.
Final decision
- I do not intend to investigate this complaint because she appealed to a Planning Inspector.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman