South Gloucestershire Council (21 018 771)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Oct 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a planning enforcement matter. This is because we cannot say the Council was wrong in the way it interpreted a planning condition and it is unlikely we could achieve any worthwhile outcome for Mr X.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council has wrongly interpreted the meaning of a planning condition restricting use of business premises near his home. He says that as a result it has failed to take enforcement action against the business and this causes noise and disturbance.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I understand Mr X does not agree with the Council’s interpretation of the condition but we cannot say it is wrong. We also could not say the Council’s wording of the condition was flawed as too much time has passed since the decision was reached and there is not enough evidence to show it intended the condition to say something else.
  2. The Council has considered the breaches reported by Mr X and it has now taken action against the business owner. It has also responded to Mr X’s complaints and explained he should continue to report any further breaches of the condition so that it can take further action. It is unlikely investigation would add to the Council’s responses to Mr X’s complaints or that it would achieve anything more for Mr X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it is unlikely we could add to the Council’s responses to Mr X’s complaints or that investigation would achieve any worthwhile outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings