London Borough of Tower Hamlets (21 017 373)
Category : Planning > Enforcement
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 02 Mar 2022
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about changes to the boundary fencing at a local school. This is because the complaint is late and there are not good reasons to investigate the complaint now.
The complaint
- The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains that the Council has wrongly allowed a school to make changes to its boundary fencing that do not benefit from planning permission. Mr B says the changes to the fencing affect the character of the boundary treatment and make the road feel more enclosed.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Mr B. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Mr B first became aware of this issue several years ago. The Council sent its final response to Mr B’s complaint in July 2019. The Council told Mr B he could complain to us. Mr B complained to us in February 2022.
- Mr B has not complained to us within 12 months of becoming aware of the issue he complains about. Also, I have not seen any information to suggest there are good reasons for Mr B’s delay making this complaint to us. So, we will not investigate this complaint.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is late and there are not good reasons to investigate the complaint now.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman