London Borough of Harrow (21 010 276)
Category : Planning > Enforcement
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 03 Apr 2022
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: Mr X complains about planning enforcement by the Council against him. We will not investigate this complaint because there was a right of appeal to a Planning Inspector.
The complaint
- Mr X complains about planning enforcement by the Council against him.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
- The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
- delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
- a decision to refuse planning permission
- conditions placed on planning permission
- a planning enforcement notice.
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
- The complainant had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision.
My assessment
- Mr X says that the Council acted unfairly in taking planning enforcement action against him for dust nuisance.
- Any dispute about the service of an Enforcement Notice could be appealed to a Planning Inspector and so the matter is out of jurisdiction.
- The Council advised Mr X that he had not built in accordance with planning permission. Mr X then carried out remedial works and submitted a retrospective planning application to authorise the building. The Council granted planning permission.
- The Ombudsman will not investigate the complaint about the Enforcement Notice for the reasons given above.
- There is no injustice caused to Mr X by the decision to approve his retrospective planning application. Any dispute would, in any event, be a matter for the Planning Inspector.
- Any boundary dispute is a private matter and not for the Council or the Ombudsman.
Final decision
- I do not intend to investigate this complaint because the matter could be appealed to a Planning Inspector.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman