London Borough of Harrow (21 010 276)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Apr 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about planning enforcement by the Council against him. We will not investigate this complaint because there was a right of appeal to a Planning Inspector.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about planning enforcement by the Council against him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
  2. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • a decision to refuse planning permission
  • conditions placed on planning permission
  • a planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. The complainant had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says that the Council acted unfairly in taking planning enforcement action against him for dust nuisance.
  2. Any dispute about the service of an Enforcement Notice could be appealed to a Planning Inspector and so the matter is out of jurisdiction.
  3. The Council advised Mr X that he had not built in accordance with planning permission. Mr X then carried out remedial works and submitted a retrospective planning application to authorise the building. The Council granted planning permission.
  4. The Ombudsman will not investigate the complaint about the Enforcement Notice for the reasons given above.
  5. There is no injustice caused to Mr X by the decision to approve his retrospective planning application. Any dispute would, in any event, be a matter for the Planning Inspector.
  6. Any boundary dispute is a private matter and not for the Council or the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because the matter could be appealed to a Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings