Northumberland County Council (20 012 764)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 May 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about the grant of planning permission for his neighbour to build an outbuilding. We will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the grant of planning permission for his neighbour to build an outbuilding.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the comments of the complainant and the Council and the complainant was given an opportunity to comment on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X’s neighbour submitted a planning application in August 2020 for an outbuilding. This was a revision of a previous similar planning application but with a raised decking area and pergola.
  2. The Planning Officer stated that the building needed planning permission because it was closer than 2.5m from the fence (which had been raised to 2.4m high under the previous planning permission).
  3. The Planning Officer concluded that the impact upon Mr X’s privacy would be lessened by the distance from the windows in the outbuilding to Mr X’s property. The Planning Officer also took into account the fact that the applicant could builder a similar building without planning permission albeit a metre further away from the fence. The Planning Officer concluded that the effect upon Mr X’s amenity did not warrant refusal of the planning application.
  4. I am satisfied that Mr X’s objections and concerns were taken into account by the Planning Officer. Mr X's dissatisfaction lies with the merits of the Council's decision but, in the absence of fault, the Ombudsman cannot criticise the Council's decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.
     

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings