North Somerset Council (20 008 162)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Dec 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains that the Council refused to take enforcement action against a neighbour. We will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council refused to take enforcement action against a neighbour.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the comments of the complainant and the Council and the complainant was given an opportunity to comment on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X’s neighbour was granted planning permission for a two storey extension. Mr X says that the property was built without complying with the conditions placed on the planning permission. He says that a window facing his property was supposed to be obscure glazed and non-opening, which was not the case when built.
  2. The Council investigated and an officer confirmed that the window had been screwed shut and a plastic film applied to the window to make it obscure glazed. The Council says that, whilst not strictly in accordance with the planning condition, the loss of amenity to Mr X did not warrant enforcement action as the window could not be seen through or opened.
  3. Mr X says that the film could be removed. The Council says that, if that were the case, enforcement action could be taken up to ten years after the date of the breach.
  4. I am satisfied that the Council properly investigated the breach. Their conclusion not to take action was made without fault and so the Ombudsman cannot be critical of that decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings