Cheshire West & Chester Council (19 018 324)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about access to the Council when attempting to appeal against an enforcement notice. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is no significant injustice to Mr X from the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about access to the Council when attempting to appeal against an enforcement notice.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we would find fault, or
  • the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the comments of the complainant and the Council and the complainant has had an opportunity to comment on the draft decision.,

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X says that he has been given one point of contact to communicate with the Council. He has been served with an enforcement notice by the Council and wishes to appeal.
  2. Information about appealing the notice is on the notice itself and on a Government website. Mr X can appeal against the notice without any need to communicate with the Council. The Planning Inspector can consider if the Council has acted properly if an application for costs is made. I do not consider that any alleged failures by the Council in communicating with Mr X are a cause of injustice as he can appeal without such communication.
  3. Any complaints about access to personal data are for the Information Commissioner’s Office.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. Subject to any further comments from the complainant, I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no injustice to him.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings