London Borough of Enfield (19 010 062)
Category : Planning > Enforcement
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 27 Nov 2019
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a planning enforcement matter. This is because it is unlikely we could achieve anything for Mr X at present.
The complaint
- The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council has failed to take enforcement action against a nearby property-owner for breaches of planning control.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
- it is unlikely we would find fault, or
- the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
- the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
- it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council, or
- it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome, or
- we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
- the Council has taken, or proposes to take, suitable action to deal with the issue.
(Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 24A(7), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I reviewed Mr X’s complaint and discussed the case with him. I made enquiries of the Council and considered its response. I shared my draft decision with Mr X and his representative and invited their comments.
What I found
- Mr X has reported possible breaches of planning control by a neighbouring property-owner. He says the Council has told him it does not have sufficient resources to enforce the breaches and he is concerned about living conditions and safety hazards for local residents.
- The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. The Council has confirmed it has an open enforcement case to deal with the breaches of planning control by the property-owner but the property-owner has recently applied for planning permission to regularise the development and it cannot reasonably take formal action until this application is determined. It says it has not reached a decision on formal enforcement action and has not declined to act on the basis of a lack of resources.
- While the Council considers the application and the enforcement case there is nothing further we could achieve for Mr X. The Council has confirmed it will consult Mr X and other residents affected/concerned by the development as part of the application process and that it intends to determine the application shortly.
- If, once the Council has determined the planning application, Mr X is unhappy with the way it handled the case he may complain to the Council again. The Council’s response should provide an update on the enforcement case and if Mr X is not happy with its progress he may raise a new complaint for us to consider. But it is unlikely we could achieve anything more for Mr X by investigating now.
Final decision
- The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because it is unlikely we could achieve anything for Mr X by investigating his complaint now.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman