Broxtowe Borough Council (19 006 034)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 25 Nov 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains of failure by the Council to take planning enforcement action after a developer raised the ground level at a property. However, Mr X does not live next door to the property, so there is no injustice to him.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, complains the Council has failed to take planning enforcement action after a developer raised the ground level at a property.

Back to top

What I have investigated

  1. I have investigated whether there is any potential injustice to Mr X as he does not live next door to the property. I give my reason for not investigating the substantive complaint at the end of this statement.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I read Mr X’s complaint and checked planning documents available on the Council’s website. I spoke to Mr X by telephone. I shared a draft of this decision with both parties and invited their comments. I received none.

Back to top

What I found

  1. A developer gained planning permission to build a property in the back garden of another property. Mr X says the developer has raised the ground level in the part of the back garden that remains with the original house.
  2. Mr X’s property does not share a boundary with the development site. Any increased ground level has not therefore caused him injustice. Any potential injustice from the increased ground level would only concern those whose properties border the site.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have discontinued my investigation as there has been no injustice to Mr X.

Back to top

Parts of the complaint that I did not investigate

  1. I have not investigated the substantive matter as Mr X has had no injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings