Durham County Council (19 005 186)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Dec 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Ms X complains about the Council’s failure to take enforcement action against a neighbour who has built a wooden structure at the front of their house. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient injustice to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about the Council’s failure to take enforcement action against a neighbour who has built a wooden structure at the front of their house.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate something that affects all or most of the people in a council’s area. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(7), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we would find fault, or
  • the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the complainant's and Council's comments. The complainant has commented on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms X’s neighbour erected a wooden structure to surround their wheelie bin at the front of their house. Ms X lives opposite. She says that the structure needs planning permission.
  2. The Council considered the matter but decided that no enforcement action was warranted.
  3. I am not persuaded that the injustice caused to Ms X by this matter warrants investigation. It causes no physical detriment to Ms X, nor does it cause any loss of amenity to her by its presence. Any cost to the tax payer is a matter which affects all or most of the population of the area and so is out of jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because the injustice does not warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings