Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

London Borough Of Brent (17 019 291)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Mar 2018

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s planning enforcement actions taken because she converted a property to flats and built an extension without planning permission. Miss X used her right of appeal to the Planning Inspector and the Ombudsman cannot therefore investigate.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council’s planning officers behaved wrongly when taking enforcement action against her for converting a property to flats and building an extension without planning permission. Miss X says the Council failed to provide her with a service and officers made false statements supporting the enforcement notice. Miss X says the Council caused her significant financial loss and financial problems, embarrassment, stress and harm to her health.
  2. Miss X complains the Council failed to address her complaints and failed to answer her questions. She says it also failed to provide information and claimed it was confidential.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal or a government minister or started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6), as amended)
  2. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about a planning enforcement notice.
  3. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered Miss X’s information and comments, the Council’s final reply to her complaints, and the Planning Inspector’s decision on Miss X’s appeal.

Back to top

What I found

  1. In 2016 the Council issued an enforcement notice requiring Miss X to remove 5 flats and demolish an extension all built without planning permission.
  2. In 2017 the Planning Inspector refused Miss X’s appeal against the enforcement notice. The Inspector considered the case issues including the time the development had been in place, whether the requirements of the notice were excessive, and the period allowed for compliance.
  3. Miss X says her complaint is about the Council’s failure to provide the service stated in its enforcement policy rather than the enforcement action. She says she has gone to the Planning Inspector and High Court about the enforcement action. She says officers made false statements supporting the enforcement notice and made fraudulent misrepresentations. She says an officer misrepresented his powers to take photographs and failed to respond to a challenge that the enforcement notice was defective.
  4. Miss X says the Council’s actions have affected her health. The enforcement action has caused financial losses, problems with her mortgage and she is struggling to reinstate the property to an attractive house.

Analysis

  1. I will not investigate this complaint for the following reasons:
      1. The complaint is outside jurisdiction because Miss X used her right of appeal to the Planning Inspector (see paragraphs 3 and 4 above). The Ombudsman cannot lawfully investigate the actions of the planning officers on the enforcement case.
      2. The Ombudsman will not investigate the complaint handling. We cannot investigate the planning actions referred to in the complaint. The Council has replied to the complaint and does not need to do more.
      3. On the request for information, there is no separate injustice the Ombudsman could investigate. I understand Miss X got the information she wanted. If she did not she can seek advice from the Information Commissioner who has powers to deal with information and data protection complaints (see paragraph 5 above).

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s planning enforcement actions taken because she converted a property to flats and built an extension without planning permission. Miss X used her right of appeal to the Planning Inspector and the Ombudsman cannot therefore investigate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page