Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a building control matter. This is because it is unlikely we could achieve a worthwhile outcome for the complainant.

The complaint

1. Mr X has complained about the Council’s building control service. The Council’s building control service was used during the construction of an extension at Mr X’s property. The Council issued a completion certificate. However, Mr X has since discovered problems with the work.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:

• further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
• we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
• there is another body better placed to consider this complaint, or
• there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

3. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

4. Most building work will require building regulation approval. The regulations will set the standards for design, construction and ensure the health and safety of the people living in or around the building. While the Council will normally visit the site at various stages of the build, it does not act as a clerk of works or a site manager and the responsibility for compliance with the regulations rests with the building owners and builders. The council’s role is to maintain the building standards for the public in general rather than protect the private interests of an individual.
5. Mr X says there are many issues with the building work and he has spent a significant amount of money trying to rectify the problems. Mr X says he will incur further costs to ensure the building complies with regulations and believes the Council should compensate him.
6. Caselaw has established that where a council has issued a completion certificate and the work is later found to be substandard, liability for any defects rests with those that commission the work and those that carry it out. We therefore cannot hold the Council responsible for substandard work by the builder and it is unlikely we could achieve a worthwhile outcome for Mr X by investigating his complaint.
7. Mr X has also complained about how the Council dealt with his request for information. However, Mr X can complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) if he is concerned about how the Council dealt with his information request. The ICO is the independent body set up to uphold information rights and is best placed to deal with Mr X’s concerns.

Back to top

Final decision

8. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is unlikely an investigation would achieve a worthwhile outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman