Northumberland County Council (21 014 391)

Category : Planning > Building control

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to take action against the developer of his property in relation to a retaining wall he believes is dangerous. This is because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council has failed to take action to deal with an unsafe retaining wall and fence on the boundary between his property and a public right of way.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has investigated Mr X’s concerns about the wall but decided that while it does show signs of minor deterioration it does not pose a risk to the public. The Council’s view is a matter of professional judgement and it is not for us to question it.
  2. If Mr X still believes the wall is unsafe then he may wish to carry out any further work he considers necessary. Mr X argues liability for maintenance of the wall rests with the developer under the terms of the deeds for his property but this would be a private matter between him and them. It would not be the Council’s responsibility to enforce Mr X’s rights against the developer.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings