Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council (21 002 894)

Category : Planning > Building control

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that the Council wrongly approved building work which did not meet the building regulations. This is because we cannot achieve the outcome Mr B wants.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains that the Council wrongly issued a building control completion certificate for an extension to his property in 2011. Mr B says since the extension was built the roof has leaked and he has recently found out that the pitch of the roof is wrong and not in line with the plans. Mr B complains the Council has refused to pay towards his costs getting the roof replaced even though the Council accepts a completion certificate should not have been issued. Mr B would like the Council to make a significant contribution to the cost of a new roof.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I have considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The primary responsibility for building work and compliance with the building regulations rests with building owners and builders. The courts have held that local authorities are not responsible for the costs of putting right defective building work which does not meet the building regulations. This means we would not ask the Council to make a payment which the courts have decided local authorities are not required to pay. So, an investigation would not achieve the outcome Mr B wants.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because we cannot achieve the outcome he wants.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings