Vale Of White Horse District Council (25 028 160)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a data breach. This is because this matter is better dealt with by the Information Commissioner.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his personal data. He says, due to an error with records associated with his council tax, the Council shared a document containing his full name with a third party. Mr X says the Council failed to acknowledge the data breach when he first reported it by telephone.
  2. Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his and his partner’s complaint about the matter. He says the Council failed to reply to his partner’s response within a month.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council committed a data breach, how it handled this or that it failed to promptly escalate the breach when he first reported it by phone. This is because the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is better placed to consider these matters.
  2. It is not a proportionate use of resources to investigate the Council’s complaint handling alone when we are not looking at the core matters. So, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is better dealt with by the ICO.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings