Isle of Wight Council (25 025 116)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mrs Y’s request for information. The Information Commissioner is better placed to consider and decide complaints about data protection.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Y complained there were delays, omissions, mistaken sharing of third-party data and poor communication following her subject access request (SAR) to the Council.
  2. Mrs Y said this caused frustration and distress.
  3. Mrs Y wants the Council to apologise, review its processes and offer a suitable remedy.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs Y.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs Y said the Council did not complete her SAR within statutory timescale. When it did, it disclosed personal information about a third party. Mrs Y also said there was poor communication and delay in carrying out an internal review of the SAR.
  2. The Information Commissioner (ICO) enforces data protection legislation. The main functions of the ICO are to uphold information rights in the public interest by promoting openness by public bodies and protecting the privacy of individuals.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. The Ombudsman normally expects someone to complain to the ICO if they have a complaint about data protection. This is because the ICO is better placed to consider and decide such matters. This applies here.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs Y’s complaint because the ICO is better placed to consider and decide complaints about data protection.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings