Cumberland Council (25 021 461)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Councils refusal to investigate matters relating to the coronial service. This is because the Council is not responsible for the actions of Coroners and we therefore have no power to investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council refused to consider his complaint about a Coroner and failed to meet its statutory duty to ensure the safe and lawful operation of the Coroner’s Service. He says this has left his family feeling unsupported. Mr X seeks an explanation of the Council’s duties, senior escalation, a meeting with the Council’s Chief Legal Officer, and confirmation that the Council can investigate these administrative failings.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about actions which are not the administrative function of a Council. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(1) as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council that the Senior Coroner failed to comply with the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 following his father’s death. He believes the Council is responsible for the governance and accountability of the Coroner’s Service and requested a formal service investigation and clarification of governance arrangements.
  2. The Council expressed its condolences but said it could not accept Mr X’s complaint because issues relating to coronial decisions fall outside its remit. It explained its role is limited to providing accommodation, staff, and support services and said it has no legal power to interfere with or influence judicial decisions made by Coroners. The Council directed Mr X to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) as the appropriate body to complain to about a Coroner.
  3. The Ombudsman has limited jurisdiction to look at complaints about the actions of the coroner’s office. Coroners are judicial office holders and not employees of the Council.
  4. Because the substance of Mr X’s complaint relates to coronial decisions and the limitations of our powers at paragraph three, we cannot investigate his complaint.
  5. In addition, further investigation is unlikely to find evidence of fault with how the Council dealt with Mr X’s request to investigate the actions of the Coroner. The Council correctly signposted Mr X to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO). The JCIO is the appropriate body to consider complaints about the conduct of a Coroner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Council is not responsible for the actions of coroners and we therefore have no power to investigate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings