Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (25 020 660)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled Miss X’s Subject Access Request. This is because the Information Commissioner’s Office is best placed to investigate the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council’s response to her Subject Access Request (SAR) did not include the full information she requested. She said its response passed the legal deadline. She said it caused her an administrative burden and emotional distress. She wants the Council to disclose all outstanding records or an explanation if they do not exist.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended.)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X submitted a SAR to the Council. The Council responded to Miss X’s SAR however Miss X said it did not provide her with the full information she requested and made a formal complaint. In its response the Council apologised for the delay in responding to her request and said it had no further information to release.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint. If Miss X thinks the Council did not handle her SAR request correctly, that would be a matter for the ICO.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because the ICO is best placed to investigate the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings