Worthing Borough Council (25 020 199)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council committed a data breach. This is because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons to exercise discretion to investigate it now.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council committed a data breach. She said she complained to the ICO (Information Commissioners Office) who upheld the complaint. She said the Council were negligent in managing the matter post ICO investigation.
  2. She said it caused significant distress, frustration and harm to her mental wellbeing. She wants the Council to acknowledge the ICO findings and issue an apology.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended.)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. Mrs X said the Council sent private data to a third party in 2021. She said she became aware of the matter in 2023. The ICO concluded its investigation in 2023 and wrote to the Council to remind it of its data protection obligations. We expect a person to complain to us within 12 months of being aware of a matter and Mrs X did not complain to us until 2025. Therefore, the complaint is late, and there is no good reason to exercise discretion to consider it now.
  2. The more time passes between the events and a complaint, the more unlikely it is we can investigate them effectively, gather reliable evidence and reach a sound decision. In older cases we also may not be able to achieve a meaningful remedy because too many circumstances have changed. We are often unable to be able to show why events occurred or understand who was responsible.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons to exercise discretion to investigate it now.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings