Sunderland City Council (25 017 293)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about misuse of personal data as it is best dealt with by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council has misused her personal and banking information on several occasions and wrongly disclosed a third party’s information to her. Miss X says this caused stress, anxiety, loss of trust and banking issues. Miss X wants the Council to acknowledge its mistakes and to take corrective action to prevent it happening again in future. Miss X also seeks guidance on her entitlement to financial compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) is the UK's independent regulator in respect of data protection matters. It is best placed to decide if the Council wrongly handled Miss X's data and if so, what it should do to put things right.
  2. Under data protection law, a person suffering damage from a data protection breach can seek compensation in court. There is a procedure open to anyone to make a money claim in court, or Miss X could consider using a solicitor, some of whom take on such cases on a conditional fee basis (‘no win, no fee’). We are not empowered to decide damage claims or to award compensation payments. It is reasonable therefore to expect Miss X to take court action for the compensation she seeks.
  3. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it is best dealt with by the ICO and Miss X can claim compensation in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings