London Borough of Harrow (25 012 993)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Freedom of Information request. We consider it reasonable for Mr X to complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. Mr X submitted a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to the Council. He complains the Council has failed comply with the request within the statutory time frame. He also says the Council has not responded to his follow-up complaints about its lack of communication.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. This complaint is about a failure to comply with an FOI request, and it would be reasonable to expect Mr X to take his complaint to the ICO which has specific powers to address it.
  2. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are not going to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it reasonable for him to take his complaint to the ICO.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings