Basildon Borough Council (25 011 147)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council failed to properly carry out a consultation. There is not enough injustice to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council wrongly carried out a public consultation into the future election arrangements for local councillors.
  2. Mr X says that as a result he was unaware of the consultation and therefore lost his right to contribute.
  3. He wants the Council to formally apologise to residents, repeat the consultation and carry out service improvements in the consultation process to restore public confidence.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X is an elected member of the Council although he has brought this complaint in his personal capacity.
  2. He is unhappy about the public consultation the Council carried out over whether the way the Council elected its councillors should change.
  3. Prior to the start of the consultation period, officers brought a paper to full Council explaining the proposals, when the consultation period would start and how it would be publicised. As a councillor Mr X would have received that report. The minutes of the meeting also show he attended and voted on the item.
  4. Therefore, Mr X had the information he required to contribute to the consultation. We will not investigate as there is no evidence he experienced an injustice.
  5. Mr X has also raised concerns about injustice to other members of the public. However, he has no standing to complain on their behalf.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough injustice to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings