Brighton & Hove City Council (25 010 549)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a data breach. This is because the Information Commissioner is better placed to consider the matter.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council breached the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in relation to the handling of his personal information. Mr X seeks compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council breached GDPR in relation to how it handled his personal data. This is because it is reasonable for Mr X to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The ICO is the regulator for information rights, and it is best placed to consider whether the Council has safeguarded Mr X’s personal data in line with its data obligations.
  2. Furthermore, we cannot achieve the outcome sought in terms of compensation for Mr X. Only the courts can adequately assess a claim for compensation. 

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the ICO is better placed to consider the matter.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings