Hartlepool Borough Council (25 010 221)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about an alleged data breach by the Council. This is because it is about a data matter best considered and decided by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains a Council officer committed a data breach in taking screenshots from her social media account without her consent and sharing this and false information about her with a third party.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  3. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The matters raised in Mrs X’s complaint relate to an alleged data breach and the sharing of her personal information without her consent. These are data matters which are best considered and decided by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). It is the body set up to consider complaints about data matters such as this. It appears, from the information Mrs X has provided, that she has already referred the matter to ICO. We will not also consider it.
  2. Also, the outcome Mrs X seeks in making her complaint to this office, for the officer to be suspended, is not an outcome that is achievable via an investigation by this office. We cannot recommend disciplinary action. It lies outside our remit.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is about data matters the ICO is best placed to consider and decide.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings