Humberside Fire Authority (25 008 716)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate X’s complaint about the Authority’s actions relating to home fire safety visits. It is unlikely we would find fault and there is no significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. X was unhappy with the Authority’s position and policy relating to visits to local residents, carried out in support of home fire safety.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating; or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. X made a complaint about the Authority’s actions relating to home fire safety visits. The Authority replied explaining its policy and the safeguards it puts into place to provide reassurance to those residents it visits. Given the nature of these visits and the explanations provided to X, it is unlikely we would find any fault.
  2. Additionally, our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the organisation. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.
  3. There is no significant injustice and because of this and my considerations at paragraph four, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate X’s complaint because it is unlikely we would find fault and there is no significant injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings