Wealden District Council (25 008 411)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the poor state of a garage Mrs X was using as a storage facility, resulting in damage to her property. This is claim for damages and we cannot decide liability, therefore it would be reasonable for Mrs X to pursue her claim through the courts who can decide on liability.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X said the Council provided a substandard garage facility, which she rented from it and which she used to store property. Mrs X said it was damp and mouldy, and as a result her property was damaged. Mrs X wants the matter resolved and for the Council to repair her garage.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X had a rental agreement with the Council for a garage. She said she first began to experience problems in 2022 with the poor state of the roof, and she said it allowed water in. She also said there were problems with the door closing. Mrs X said her property was damaged because of mould and damp conditions.
  2. The Ombudsman cannot determine liability claims for negligence. These are legal claims which may only be determined by insurers or the courts. It is normal procedure for a person suffering damages caused by the Council’s inaction to submit an insurance claim against the Council. This will then be treated as a claim, rather than a complaint and passed on to its insurers or legal team for a response on liability. If the Council disputes liability, then we would expect a person to make a claim with the courts.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because she has an alternative legal remedy to make her claim to the courts, who can decide liability. And because we cannot decide liability, it is reasonable to expect her to use this alternative remedy.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings