Herefordshire Council (25 007 894)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s liability for damage at a property, because Mrs X has an alternative legal remedy. Claims such as these are best resolved by the courts and in any case, we cannot decide on liability, therefore it would be reasonable to expect Mrs X to use this alternative remedy.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council did not support her in her claim for damage, to her property. She said this occurred following work on her property by private contractors, recommended by the Council. Mrs X said she has suffered extensive property damage and emotional distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X said her roof was damaged by private contractors, who were carrying out work, as a result of Council funded grant. She said because the Council appointed the contractors, it was therefore liable for the damage to her property and for the emotional impact that followed.
  2. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. The Ombudsman will not normally investigate complaints about damage to property arising from claims of negligence.
  3. Negligence claims and interpreting the law around legal torts are generally best decided by a court where no insurance liability is accepted. Only a court can decide whether the Council is liable to pay damages for the loss Mrs X has claimed.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because Mrs X has an alternative legal remedy and because only a court can decide on liability and we cannot, it would be reasonable to expect her to use it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings