London Borough of Haringey (25 007 775)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alleged data breach by the Council. This is because complaints about data matters such as this, are best considered and decided by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained that the Council sent him an email with personal data belonging to another person. Mr X stated that he felt threatened when the Council asked him to delete the email he received in error. Mr X would like the Council to apologise and consider compensation for emotional harm and anxiety.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained that the Council sent him an email which contained personal details of another person by mistake.
  2. The Council apologised to Mr X, investigated the incident and informed Mr X of their findings.
  3. The Council directed Mr X to raise his concern with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).
  4. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because it is a complaint about a potential data breach. Complaints about data matters such as this are best considered and decided by the ICO. It is the body set up to consider complaints about data matters and so it is best placed to consider it. Additionally, it would not be fault the Council asked Mr X to delete the email once it learned about the mistake.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the ICO is better placed to consider his complaint about a potential data protection breach.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings