Suffolk County Council (25 006 786)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a damage claim as it is reasonable to expect the complainant to resort to court action for the remedy she seeks.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council damaged her drive when it carried out roadworks nearby. Mrs X complains the Council initially told her it would repair her drive but then refused to accept liability for the damage. Mrs X wants the Council to repair her drive.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Information Mrs X provided to us does suggest that initially the Council agreed to repair her drive but then later, refused to accept liability for the damage.
  2. Only the courts can determine if the Council is legally liable for the damage to Mrs X’s drive and whether it should make reparations. We cannot make such determinations. There is a relatively simple, low-cost procedure open to anyone to make such a claim in court so Mrs X could take such action directly, or through her own insurers. It is reasonable to expect Mrs X to take such action, and we will not therefore investigate.
  3. I recognise Mrs X’s frustration and disappointment that the Council ultimately decided not to accept liability for the damage, but we will not investigate this in isolation given in the end this matter can only be decided in court. It is unlikely we could achieve any other meaningful outcome for Mrs X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because we can achieve no worthwhile outcome for her as this matter can only, ultimately, be decided in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings