Kent County Council (25 006 564)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council removed his political banner. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council removed his political banner during the election period. He stated the Council’s complaint response failed to acknowledge electoral guidance or the fairness of the electoral environment. He would like the matter to be independently investigated to address his concerns regarding transparency, procedural integrity and potential political bias.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X was an electoral candidate and put up a banner advertising his political party.
  2. The Council stated that it received a report of a political banner on the public highway via its ‘Report a Fault’ online tool. The Council stated that it gave Mr X one week to remove the banner before it was taken down and put in storage.
  3. In its complaint response, the Council stated that it does not allow any advertising on the highway, including political campaign material. The Council provided a map to show the banner was on the publicly maintained highway.
  4. The Council stated that it had used its powers under Section 132 of the Highways Act 1980 to remove the unauthorised banner. In its correspondence with Mr X, the Council confirmed that Councillors did not make the decision to remove the banner.
  5. We will not investigate this complaint because the Council has set out its reasons for removing the banner and referenced the relevant legislation. It gave him the opportunity to remove the banner, and told him how it could be collected. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings