Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council (25 004 649)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions when it recovered Miss X’s deceased pet. It is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council did properly respond and inform her that it had recovered her deceased pet. She also complained the Council did not scan her pet for ownership information, and did not return her calls.
  2. Miss X complained the Council’s actions made her feel ill, anxious and impacted her financially.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X was unhappy with the Council’s communication, which she said caused a delay in collecting her pet, after the Council recovered it.
  2. I have considered the Council’s stage one and stage two complaint responses. The Council told Miss X it was not able to identify her pet, when it first recovered it. It said when it carried out another scan, it identified her pet and was then able to confirm ownership to Miss X. Given the Council’s explanation for its actions here, it is unlikely we would find fault. Therefore, we will not investigate.
  3. Nor will we investigate how the Council communicated with Miss X over this matter, because it is not a good use of public resources to investigate how the Council communicated, when we are not considering the substantive issues.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it is unlikely we would find fault.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings