London Fire Commissioner (25 002 325)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the recording of a fire by the Authority. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Authority, and we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X wants.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the recording of a fire outside his property, which the Authority recorded as a ‘small fire’. Mr X thinks the record should show the incident was arson. He believes recording a small fire contributed to the police not investigating the incident, leading to stress for him and others.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Authority.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. There was a fire near Mr X’s property in February 2023. In September 2024 Mr X became aware the Authority had recorded the event as a small fire and made a complaint to it.
  2. From the information available, the fire had been extinguished when the Authority arrived at the incident. Mr X said witnesses informed it the fire was deliberate.
  3. The authority reported a ‘small fire'. From the complaint replies, it said it used its categorisation system on how it reported the event. It was unable to confirm the fire was deliberate and gave an explanation in the complaint response.
  4. I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault and we cannot question the outcome of the decision where an organisation has correctly followed procedures.
  5. Mr X would like the category of the fire amended. We would be unable to achieve this through investigation as we could not instruct the Authority to change its decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Authority, and we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings