Exeter City Council (25 000 903)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to submit his questions to a Council meeting. There is no significant injustice, and we cannot achieve the outcome he is looking for.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said he was unhappy the Council refused to accept several questions he submitted to it, for inclusion at a Council meeting. Mr X said the Council’s reasons for refusing these were wrong and inaccurate. He said he was concerned about the impact on local democracy and wants the Council to pay damages and respond to the questions he submits.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X wrote to the Council with several questions in advance of a Council meeting. The Council refused to accept the questions and explained why. Mr X was unhappy with the explanations and complained to us.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint because Mr X has not suffered a significant personal injustice, which is serious enough to warrant a full Ombudsman investigation. Our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the Council.
  3. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.
  4. Mr X has also asked for consideration of an award of punitive damages to be made against the Council. We do not award punitive damages and therefore cannot achieve the substantive outcome he is looking for.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no significant injustice and we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X is looking for.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings