Cleveland Fire Brigade (24 022 586)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Authority’s response to and actions at a fire. There is no significant personal injustice, and we cannot achieve the outcome the complainant is looking for.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Authority failed to tell the police of a possible arson event that occurred on his property.
  2. He says is has cost him financially to pursue his complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X had a fire at his property which he suspected could be arson. He says the Authority advised him to contact the police to get a crime reference number. He says the police came out to the property to carry out an investigation following the fire.
  2. Mr X feels the police would have attended at the time of the fire if a report of arson had been made sooner, and this would mean it was more likely the police would have made an arrest.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint because Mr X has not suffered a significant personal injustice. While I appreciate Mr X has incurred financial costs it was his choice to instruct solicitors to pursue his complaint. He has asked for these costs to be refunded. We would not normally award solicitor costs and therefore cannot achieve the substantive outcome he is looking for.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no significant injustice and we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X is looking for.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings